When we have a vendor payment that contains multiple invoices that overflow into additional checks,
This is useful so that when we run a check voucher register report, we will not see a gap in check sequence. Once of the checks we do monthly is to run a prior month check/voucher register to ensure that all checks have been accounted for and that there were no checks written that have not been authorized. Most of the time when there is a gap in the check sequence, it's due to an overflow check payment.
Comments: 7
-
29 Jun, '21
Jessica RocheFor clarification, are you requesting that if the system uses a check for overflow purposes, and in essence is then 'spoiled' that it automatically lists the number on the check register and reflects it as spoiled?
-
29 Sep, '21
Suzanne AdminHello,
The MIP team is actively monitoring this request. Please continue to provide screenshots, comments, and upvotes.
Cheers,
Megh -
11 Apr, '23
Carey ThurstonMIP should automatically mark the overflow check as spoiled rather than making someone do it manually.
-
11 May, '23
Marla BradbyThere should be an option (during check printing) that when there is an overflow remittance, to print the remittance separately after checks have printing. This would eliminate wasted checks/unlisted spoiled checks, but still have the entire remittance for the vendor payment. I hope this makes sense!
-
24 May, '23
Alissa RodgersAlso when there is overflow and one payment is printed with remittance on more than one stub, MIP records the incorrect check #.
For instance if a check to ABC Business uses check #s 100 and 101 to print remittance. The actual check is on check 100, but MIP skips 100 and records the check as number 101. Therefore the bank rec shows check 101 but the bank shows check 100. -
26 Jan
Heather @ GCWAYES - please do this! This has also impacted the wrong number showing up on our positive pay report.
-
20 Feb
Alicia FultsYES! The overflow check needs to automatically be spoiled by the system.